Foley & Lardner LLP recently co-hosted a webinar with the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) to discuss how a new presidential administration and evolving state-driven regulations are effecting boardrooms. A summary of that discussion can be found below.
– Christine Gorjanc, Board Director
– Ed Burbach, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP
– Patrick Daugherty, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP
– Louis Lehot, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP (Moderator)
– Christopher Swift, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP
– Jessica Lochmann, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and antitrust authorities are undergoing significant shifts under new leadership. Changes will impact capital markets, digital assets, and corporate governance. Below is an overview of key regulatory insights and what they mean for company leadership.
Former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins is expected to take over as chairman. Known for his market-friendly approach, Atkins has been a advocate for easing capital formation regulations and creating a more structured framework for crypto assets.
Early signals indicate that the SEC is moving away from regulation by enforcement and toward a more defined rulemaking process, with an emphasis on market engagement before implementing new policies. Additionally, the agency is expected to move away from ESG considerations, focusing instead on the direct financial impact of regulations.
Momentum for U.S. ESG and climate disclosure regulations has slowed, but companies still face compliance obligations under EU and California laws. Investors and key stakeholders continue to assess sustainability efforts, making it important for boards to evaluate how ESG considerations align with long-term value creation.
Corporate approaches to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are also changing. Many companies are shifting from broad commitments to more practical implementation. Transparency in proxy statements remains pivotal to ensure consistency between public claims and internal practices.
M&A activity is predicted to become streamlined under the new leadership at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) remains active in enforcing antitrust laws, continuing cases initiated under the previous administration.
Spearheaded by Elon Musk, the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) may influence regulation. Rapid budget cuts and agency restructuring has led to staff cuts, affecting the speed of regulatory reviews and enforcement actions.
The DOJ has temporarily scaled back FCPA enforcement, but companies should remain vigilant. Anti-bribery laws at state, local, and international levels continue to apply, and violations may still be prosecuted under future administrations.
The administration is using executive orders (EOs) to roll back regulations and implement new policies, with varying degrees of impact:
At the state level, attorneys general (AGs) are becoming more assertive in shaping corporate regulations. Texas, for example, has made significant changes to highlight the state as business friendly to attract more companies to incorporate there.
Expect further tariff measures targeting the EU, China, and potentially India. Companies should engage in scenario planning to evaluate whether reshoring or relocating supply chains could mitigate long-term risks.
National security concerns continue to shape regulatory scrutiny of artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, and other emerging technologies. Companies working on transformative AI solutions should be prepared for heightened oversight. Boards should ensure they have clear strategies for AI adoption while maintaining compliance with evolving regulations.
As the regulatory environment continues to evolve, businesses must remain proactive in navigating these changes. Staying engaged with policymakers, adapting governance strategies, and ensuring transparency in disclosures will be key to managing risk and seizing new opportunities.

Helping businesses and ventures with compelling technologies reach their growth objectives with sound legal strategies and solutions.
Attorney advertising – prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Opinions expressed here are my own and not my law firm.